|Back to the Scottish Parliament||Minutes of Proceedings Vol. 3, No. 6 Session 2|
Meeting of the Parliament
Thursday 26 May 2005
Note: (DT) signifies a decision taken at Decision Time.
The meeting opened at 9.15 am.
1. Student and Graduate Debt: Fiona Hyslop moved S2M-2866—That the Parliament notes with concern growing student and graduate debt in Scotland, which not only hinders opportunities for the individuals concerned, but also damages society and the wider economy generally; further notes the spiralling cost to the taxpayer of the expensive and bureaucratic student loan system and the growing consensus that it is unsustainable, and calls on the Scottish Executive to come forward with a constructive review, incorporating a number of proposals to address this growing problem and encompassing an assessment of replacing student loans, including the graduate endowment repayment, with a universal system of grants.
The Deputy Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Learning (Allan Wilson) moved amendment S2M-2866.2 to motion S2M-2866—
Leave out from “notes with concern” to end and insert—
Murdo Fraser moved amendment S2M-2866.1 to motion S2M-2866—
Leave out from “further” to end and insert—
After debate, amendment S2M-2866.2 was agreed to ((DT) by division: For 60, Against 44, Abstentions 7). As a result amendment S2M-2866.1 was pre-empted.
The motion, as amended was then agreed to ((DT) by division: For 62, Against 44, Abstentions 7).
Accordingly, the Parliament resolved—That the Parliament agrees that the support arrangements for students ordinarily resident in Scotland should continue to be based on fairness and affordability; agrees that such a system should include free tuition, regardless of family income, and bursary support for those from less well-off backgrounds; welcomes the increased level of the Young Students’ Bursary and its extended eligibility; notes that liable graduates pay the graduate endowment in respect of the higher education benefits that they have received with the payments adding to the fund to pay support bursaries for students from poorer backgrounds, and recognises that the publication of the survey of Scottish students’ income and expenditure, later this year, will allow for a better understanding of the situation facing students and the continued development of policy to meet their needs.
2. Age Discrimination in the NHS: Shona Robison moved S2M-2861—That the Parliament is concerned about the lack of personal care and attention given to older people in some acute hospitals in Scotland and believes that the Scottish Executive should establish, as a matter of urgency, an independent inquiry into direct and indirect age discrimination within the NHS.
The Deputy Minister for Health and Community Care (Rhona Brankin) moved amendment S2M-2861.3 to motion S2M-2861—
Leave out from “is concerned” to end and insert—
Nanette Milne moved amendment S2M-2861.1 to motion S2M-2861—
Leave out from “and believes” to end and insert—
After debate, amendment S2M-2861.3 was agreed to ((DT) by division: For 61, Against 41, Abstentions 12). As a result amendment S2M-2861.1 was pre-empted.
The motion, as amended was then agreed to ((DT) by division: For 63, Against 17, Abstentions 34).
Accordingly, the Parliament resolved—That the Parliament welcomes the work of NHS Quality Improvement Scotland on its 2004 review of older people in acute care and its recommendations on how to improve services; welcomes the independent inquiry set up by NHS Lothian in response to recent criticisms of its standards of care, and welcomes the fact that the Scottish Executive has commenced work on an overarching framework for healthcare and community care for older people in Scotland, having due regard to David Kerr’s report on the future of the NHS.
3. General Question Time: Questions were answered by Scottish Ministers and junior Scottish Ministers.
4. First Minister’s Question Time: Questions were answered by the First Minister (Mr Jack McConnell).
5. Themed Question Time: Questions on Enterprise , Lifelong Learning and Transport, and on Justice and Law Officers were answered by Scottish Ministers and junior Scottish Ministers and by the Scottish Law Officers.
6. Business Motion: Ms Margaret Curran, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved S2M-2875—That the Parliament agrees that, during Stage 3 of the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Bill, debate of groups of amendments shall, subject to Rule 9.8.4A, be brought to a conclusion by the time-limits indicated (each time limit being calculated from when the Stage begins and excluding any periods when other business is under consideration or when the meeting of the Parliament is suspended or otherwise not in progress):
Group 1 – 30 minutes
Group 2 – 45 minutes.
The motion was agreed to.
7. Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Bill - Stage 3: The Bill was considered at Stage 3.
The following amendments were agreed to without division: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
8. Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Bill - Stage 3: The Deputy Minister for Justice (Hugh Henry) moved S2M-2772—That the Parliament agrees that the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Bill be passed.
After debate, the motion was agreed to (DT).
9. Decision Time: Ms Margaret Curran, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved, without notice, a motion under Rule 11.2.4 of Standing Orders that Decision Time on Thursday 26 May 2005 shall begin at 4.06 pm. The motion was agreed to.
10. Decision Time: The Parliament took decisions on items 1, 2 and 8 as noted above.
11. Proposed Closure of Rural and Special Needs Schools in Aberdeenshire: The Parliament debated S2M-2770 in the name of Richard Lochhead—That the Parliament notes with concern the proposals by Aberdeenshire Council to close or amalgamate a number of local schools; recognises the strength of feeling amongst parents and the wider community over the implications of closing those schools, as illustrated by the formation of the Garioch Schools Action Group and other local campaigns; notes in particular the proposal to close St Andrew’s school in Inverurie, a school that is widely recognised as providing an excellent educational environment for children with special needs; recognises the opposition to the current proposals by local parents at St Andrew’s who are genuinely concerned by the impact some of the options proposed by Aberdeenshire Council will have on their children; notes the ongoing confusion over the exact nature of the local authority’s proposals which is causing considerable distress amongst parents; believes that Aberdeenshire Council must make available to parents all the necessary information in relation to all those schools proposed for closure as part of the current consultation process; considers that Aberdeenshire Council should recognise the strength of the arguments put forward by parents and the wider community for the retention of their local schools, and further considers that the Scottish Executive should play what role it can to ensure that Aberdeenshire Council’s proposals do not damage the educational welfare of the children and wider interests of the community.
11. Motion without Notice: Richard Lochhead moved without notice that, under Rule 8.14.3, the debate be extended until 5.12pm . The motion was agreed to.
The meeting closed at 5.12 pm .
P E Grice
The following instruments were laid before the Parliament on 26 May 2005 and are subject to annulment—
The following reports were published on 26 May 2005—